[R] More help with stl?

stephen sefick ssefick at gmail.com
Tue Sep 2 18:01:53 CEST 2008


I can't reproduce this because the data has two points 0 and one at
the ends of the data set, and I get an na.fail error.  There is no
periodic part to this data- it doesn't seem because there are only two
points.

stephen

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:38 AM,  <rkevinburton at charter.net> wrote:
> I don't understand the output of stl. As a simple example:
>
> y <- numeric(1:365)
> y[250] = 1
>
> stl <- stl(ts(y, frequency=7), s.window="periodic")
>
> This returns without error but the results are puzzling to me. If you plot the results it is probably easiest to visualize what I mean.
>
> plot(stl)
>
> This shows the original data (a single spike at 250). A trend (which also shows a bump at 250). It is the rest that I have a question on. For the "seasonal" component it seems to show a sinusoid like wave with a period roughly a week (7 days) long all with the same amplitude. I can't see how a single spike can generate a "seasonal" component that is periodic for every period in the data. Finally the "remainder" portion of the data generated seems to show just what I want, a representation of the input. But if this is ruly the remainder (data - (trend + seasonal)) then shouldn't it have all entries close to zero? Please help me with my misunderstanding if you have any experience with stl.
>
> Finally it has been suggested that in order to find an overall formula to represent the data a model will need to be constructed. I unfortunately don't have any experience in developing a model. Any hints on where to start?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kevin
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>



-- 
Stephen Sefick
Research Scientist
Southeastern Natural Sciences Academy

Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are
so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and
make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not exhausted the
annoying little problems of being mammals.

	-K. Mullis



More information about the R-help mailing list