[R] contr.treatments query
(Ted Harding)
Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk
Tue May 20 02:12:36 CEST 2008
Hi Folks,
I'm a bit puzzled by the following (example):
N<-factor(sample(c(1,2,3),1000,replace=TRUE))
unique(N)
# [1] 3 2 1
# Levels: 1 2 3
So far so good. Now:
contrasts(N)<-contr.treatment(3, base=1, contrasts=FALSE)
contrasts(N)
# 1 2
# 1 1 0
# 2 0 1
# 3 0 0
whereas:
contr.treatment(3, base=1, contrasts=FALSE)
# 1 2 3
# 1 1 0 0
# 2 0 1 0
# 3 0 0 1
contr.treatment(3, base=1, contrasts=TRUE)
# 2 3
# 1 0 0
# 2 1 0
# 3 0 1
I can follow the last two fine -- they are what is implied
by the code for contr.treatment().
Likewise:
contrasts(factor(Nlevs <-c(1,2,3)))
# 2 3
# 1 0 0
# 2 1 0
# 3 0 1
But why the different result when applied to N?
With thanks,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 20-May-08 Time: 01:12:30
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
More information about the R-help
mailing list