[R] Fedora 9?

[Peter Dalgaard]

Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Jonathan Baron wrote:
>   
>> Not to be impatient, but something seems odd.
>>
>> The CRAN repository has nothing for Fedora 9.
>>
>> The RPM of R that comes with Fedora 9 is version 2.6.2.  Someone
>> connected with the Fedora project must have built that.
>>
>> R 2.7 is not in the "updates" for Fedora 9, so nobody connected with
>> Fedora has done that.
>>
>> However - and this is the odd thing - the "development" repository of
>> Fedora has R 2.7 for Fedora 10.  So whoever did that skipped Fedora 9.
>>
>> Advice?  
>>
>> I will happily accept the answers "wait" or "install from source" or
>> "submit a bug report to Fedora."  I just want to know, in part so I
>> know what to do with the computer that serves RSiteSearch (which is
>> still running Fedora 8 and R 2.6.2).
>>
>> Jon
>>   
>>     
> There's already a bugzilla report, see
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2008-May/msg01341.html
>
> The upshot seems to be that
>
> (a) 2.7.0 came out while F9 was frozen
>
> (b) while F9 was frozen there were also no F8/F7 version upgrades (so
> that you don't need to downgrade R to upgrade Fedora)
>
> (c) the process for getting new releases out is intrinsically slow.
> There's a "karma system" where potential new RPM's are kept in
> quarantine and can be thumbed up or down by testers, and this apparently
> invariably times out at a score of 0 after two weeks (a +3 would cause
> immediate release).
>
>   
Credit where due: I forgot to say that Marc Schwartz dug out most of
this information.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph:  (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk)              FAX: (+45) 35327907