[R] shapiro wilk normality test

Johannes Huesing johannes at huesing.name
Sun Jul 13 21:53:47 CEST 2008


Frank E Harrell Jr <f.harrell at vanderbilt.edu> [Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:07:37PM CEST]:
> (Ted Harding) wrote:
>> On 13-Jul-08 13:29:13, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> A large P-value means nothing more than needing more data.  No  
>>> conclusion is possible.  Please read the classic paper Absence of  
>>> Evidence is not Evidence for Absence.
>>
[...]
>
> It's real.  Full text is available to all:  
> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/311/7003/485

The quotation is attributed to the late Carl Sagan who 
seemed to have used it as a strawman argument , see 
http://oyhus.no/AbsenceOfEvidence.html.

-- 
Johannes Hüsing               There is something fascinating about science. 
                              One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture 
mailto:johannes at huesing.name  from such a trifling investment of fact.                
http://derwisch.wikidot.com         (Mark Twain, "Life on the Mississippi")



More information about the R-help mailing list