[R] shapiro wilk normality test
Johannes Huesing
johannes at huesing.name
Sun Jul 13 21:53:47 CEST 2008
Frank E Harrell Jr <f.harrell at vanderbilt.edu> [Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:07:37PM CEST]:
> (Ted Harding) wrote:
>> On 13-Jul-08 13:29:13, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> A large P-value means nothing more than needing more data. No
>>> conclusion is possible. Please read the classic paper Absence of
>>> Evidence is not Evidence for Absence.
>>
[...]
>
> It's real. Full text is available to all:
> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/311/7003/485
The quotation is attributed to the late Carl Sagan who
seemed to have used it as a strawman argument , see
http://oyhus.no/AbsenceOfEvidence.html.
--
Johannes Hüsing There is something fascinating about science.
One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture
mailto:johannes at huesing.name from such a trifling investment of fact.
http://derwisch.wikidot.com (Mark Twain, "Life on the Mississippi")
More information about the R-help
mailing list