[R] Is = now the same as <- in assigning values
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch at stats.uwo.ca
Thu Dec 18 16:40:03 CET 2008
On 12/18/2008 10:13 AM, Kenn Konstabel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Wacek Kusnierczyk <
> Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no> wrote:
>
>> ... but this is also legal if you really hate <- :
>>
>> foo({x = 2})
>> # assign to x, pass to foo as a
>>
>
> This is legal but doesn't do what you probably expect -- although
> documentation for `<-` says the value (returned by <-) is 'value' i.e.
> whatever is on the right side ...
>
>> x<-NULL # just to make sure it's not yet 42
>> foo <- function(a) a
>> foo({x = 42}) # no result
>> x
> [1] 42
All of x = 42, x <- 42, foo({x = 42}) and foo(x <- 42) do return 42, but
they do it "invisibly", so it won't print. So "no result" isn't quite
right...
Duncan Murdoch
>
> If you really hate <-, you should do either
> foo({(x=42)}) # or ....
> foo({x=42; x}) # or even ...
> foo(a=force(x=43))
>
> As for = being more intuitive, my favorite example is x=x+1 (how on earth
> can x equal x+1 ??? ... wait, this is an assignment ¤#§£$@{{!!!).
>
> KK
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help
mailing list