[R] chron and R 2.8

[Gabor Grothendieck]

Two things to try:

- try running both under 2.7.2 instead of trying both under 2.8
- if you know how to build packages from source then try rebuilding the
chron you have under 2.7.2 using 2.98.  You can find it here:
http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/chron/


On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, stephen sefick <ssefick at gmail.com> wrote:
> I found the library where all of the older packages are located.
>
> library(chron, lib =
> "/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library")
>
> Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) :
>  unable to load shared library
> '/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library/chron/libs/i386/chron.so':
>  dlopen(/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library/chron/libs/i386/chron.so,
> 6): Library not loaded:
> /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/lib/libR.dylib
>  Referenced from:
> /Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library/chron/libs/i386/chron.so
>  Reason: image not found
> Error: package/namespace load failed for 'chron'
>
> The code above works with zoo
> library(zoo, lib =
> "/Library/Frameworks/R.Framework/Versions/2.7/Resources/library")
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Gabor Grothendieck
> <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
>> To run the old version of chron that you have under 2.7.2
>> into 2.8.0, on 2.7.2 issue the command (note initial dot):
>>
>> .libPaths()
>>
>> Suppose you find that the library that contains chron in
>> 2.7.2 is "/a/b".
>>
>> Then on 2.8.0 ensure that you don't have chron on the search path
>>
>> search()
>>
>> and if you do detach it:
>>
>> detach("package:chron")
>> search() # should no longer be there
>>
>> Then run this where "..." is the library that the old version of chron
>> is in under 2.7.2.
>>
>> library(chron, lib = "...")
>>
>> To run the new version of chron detach the old version and just use:
>>
>> library(chron)
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:14 PM, stephen sefick <ssefick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes
>>> chron 2.3-25
>>> zoo 1.5-4
>>> R 2.8
>>> Mac OS X 10.5.5
>>>
>>> Gabor I don't know how to start up another verison of R on the mac.  I
>>> will figure this out, and get back to you (I can then test both of
>>> them side by side).
>>>
>>> other fast installation (version numbers from description files in R
>>> 2.7.2 directory)
>>> chron 2.3-24
>>> zoo 1.5-4
>>> Mac OS X 10.5.5
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
>>> <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Are you using the same version of chron both times?
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:05 AM, stephen sefick <ssefick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> has anyone had problems with the upgrade to R 2.8 and chron date
>>>>> classes.  I have a large zoo object that has a chron index, and it is
>>>>> taking 5x or so longer to do the same calculation as with 2.7 if it
>>>>> doesn't fail.  I will provide anything necessary I am not entirely
>>>>> sure what ya'll would need if anything to try and reproduce the
>>>>> behavior.  I am using the package StreamMetabolism.
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Stephen Sefick
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are
>>>>> so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and
>>>>> make us feel like gods.  We are mammals, and have not exhausted the
>>>>> annoying little problems of being mammals.
>>>>>
>>>>>                                                                -K. Mullis
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>>>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stephen Sefick
>>>
>>> Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are
>>> so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and
>>> make us feel like gods.  We are mammals, and have not exhausted the
>>> annoying little problems of being mammals.
>>>
>>>                                                                -K. Mullis
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Sefick
>
> Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are
> so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and
> make us feel like gods.  We are mammals, and have not exhausted the
> annoying little problems of being mammals.
>
>                                                                -K. Mullis
>