[R] Is this an artifact of using "which"?
Uwe Ligges
ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
Mon Apr 14 13:39:53 CEST 2008
Tania Oh wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I used "which" to obtain a subset of values from my data.frame.
> however, I find that there is a "trace" of the values I have removed.
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciate.
>
> Below is my data:
>
> d <- data.frame( val = 1:10,
> group = sample(LETTERS[1:5], 10, repl=TRUE) )
>
> >d
> val group
> 1 1 B
> 2 2 E
> 3 3 B
> 4 4 C
> 5 5 A
> 6 6 B
> 7 7 A
> 8 8 E
> 9 9 E
> 10 10 A
>
> ## selecting everything that is not group "A"
> d<-d[which(d$group !="A"),]
>
> > d
> val group
> 1 1 B
> 2 2 E
> 3 3 B
> 4 4 C
> 6 6 B
> 8 8 E
> 9 9 E
>
> > levels(d$group)
> [1] "A" "B" "C" "E"
>
> ## why is group A still reflected here?
Because you have removed elements from a factor objects that has
particular levels. You remove elements (=observations), but the factor
still knows that all levels are possible (stired in attributes of the
object).
If you want to remove all levels without corresponding observations, use
explicit drop=TRUE as the help page suggests, e.g.:
d <- d[d$group != "A", ]
d$group <- d$group[ , drop = TRUE]
Uwe Ligges
> Many thanks in advance,
> tania
>
> D.phil student
> Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics
> Oxford University
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help
mailing list