[R] statistics - hypothesis testing question
Greg Snow
Greg.Snow at intermountainmail.org
Thu Sep 13 21:08:41 CEST 2007
Is the data paired? i.e. do you have an A and a B from week 1, then the
same for each following week?
If so, then you could probably do a simple sign test, within each week
see if rsquared B > rsquared A. under the null hypothesis that A and B
are equivalent this should be a binomial with parameter = 0.5. If you
want something a little fancier then you could do some type of
permutation test (which the sign test is a special case of).
Hope this helps,
--
Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D.
Statistical Data Center
Intermountain Healthcare
greg.snow at intermountainmail.org
(801) 408-8111
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org
> [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Leeds, Mark (IED)
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:18 PM
> To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: [R] statistics - hypothesis testing question
>
> I estimate two competing simple regression models, A and B
> where the LHS is the same in both cases but the predictor is
> different ( I handle the intercept issue based on other
> postings I have seen ). I estimate the two models on a weekly
> basis over 24 weeks.
> So, I end up with 24 RSquaredAs and 24 RsquaredBs, so
> essentally 2 time series of Rsquareds. This doesn't have to
> be necessarily thought of as a time series problem but, is
> there a usual way, given the Rsquared data, to test
>
> H0 : Rsquared B = Rsquared A versus H1 : Rsquared B > Rsquared A
>
> so that I can map the 24 R squared numbers into 1 statistic.
> Maybe that's somehow equivalent to just running 2 big
> regressions over the whole 24 weeks and then calculating a
> statistic from those based on those regressions ?
>
> I broke things up into 24 weeks because I was thinking that
> the stability of the performance difference of the two models
> could be examined over time. Essentially these are simple
> time series regressions X_t = B*X_t-1 + epsilon so I always
> need to consider whether any type of behavior is stable. But
> now I am thinking that, if I just want one overall number,
> then maybe I should be considering all the data simultaneously ?
>
> In a nutshell, I am looking for any suggestions on the best
> way to test whether Model B is better than Model A where
>
> Model A : X_t = Beta*X_t-1 + epsilon
>
> Model B : X_t = Betastar*Xstar_t-1 + epsilonstar
>
>
> Thanks fo your help.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is not an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to
> buy/se...{{dropped}}
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list