[R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs
deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 22:24:05 CEST 2007
On 10/7/07, Frede Aakmann Tøgersen <FredeA.Togersen at agrsci.dk> wrote:
> Have you ever considered using C-u C-c C-r instead of C-c C-r?
Yes (or equivalently (setq ess-eval-visibly-p nil)), and found that I
didn't like it much. In any case, I'm not looking for ugly
workarounds, I just wanted to point out that this could explain the
> Best regards
> Fra: r-help-bounces at r-project.org på vegne af deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com
> Sendt: lø 06-10-2007 23:10
> Til: Dirk Eddelbuettel
> Cc: r-help at r-project.org
> Emne: Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs
> On 10/6/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> > On 6 October 2007 at 11:01, Scionforbai wrote:
> > | > What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are
> > | > these ESS features or LaTeX related features?
> > |
> > | is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R process
> > | within emacs is way much slower than in a regular terminal/console?
> > | (linux here)
> > It's just you, and if you think some more about it, you'll see why we are
> > all
> > grinning. [ Hint: it can't be slower, outside of ridiculous corner
> > sitations
> > where there isn't enough ram for Emacs and R at the same time. Or foobared
> > setups. In all normal situations, it'll be the same. ]
> Actually, copying multi-line R code (e.g. C-c C-r) is way slower with
> ESS if you use Emacs22 (and its derivatives such as AquaMacs). Things
> are perfect with Emacs21 though (and I'm sticking with it). Maybe that
> explains the discrepancy.
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help