[R] Speeding up
ONKELINX, Thierry
Thierry.ONKELINX at inbo.be
Mon Jul 9 15:55:52 CEST 2007
Dear Bjorn,
Do you know that mean(xy*ind)+mean(xy*!ind) yields the same value for
all i? Maybe you meant mean(xy[ind]) + mean(xy[!ind])
sapply(xord, function(xordi, xy = x){
ind <- xy < xordi
mean(xy*ind)+mean(xy*!ind)
})
Cheers,
Thierry
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature
and Forest
Cel biometrie, methodologie en kwaliteitszorg / Section biometrics,
methodology and quality assurance
Gaverstraat 4
9500 Geraardsbergen
Belgium
tel. + 32 54/436 185
Thierry.Onkelinx op inbo.be
www.inbo.be
Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully
considered what they do not say. ~William W. Watt
A statistical analysis, properly conducted, is a delicate dissection of
uncertainties, a surgery of suppositions. ~M.J.Moroney
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: r-help-bounces op stat.math.ethz.ch
> [mailto:r-help-bounces op stat.math.ethz.ch] Namens Van Campenhout Bjorn
> Verzonden: maandag 9 juli 2007 15:12
> Aan: r-help op stat.math.ethz.ch
> Onderwerp: [R] Speeding up
>
> Hi R-helpers,
>
> I am new in programming and R, so this may be basic. I need
> to speed up a procedure where I minimize some function on
> different partitions of the data. I can do this with a loop,
> as for instance in:
>
> i<-1
> meanmin<-Inf
> while (i<length(x)) {
> ind<-x<xord[i]
> if (some function to be minimized<meanmin) {
> meanmin<-some function to be minimized
> indmin<-xord[i]
> }
> i<-i+1
> }
> print(indmin)
>
> I learned that I should avoid loops, so I found the following
> alternative:
>
> dmat<-outer(x,xord,"<")*1
> ss<-apply(dmat,2,function (z) some function to be minimized)
> indmin<-xord[which.min(ss)]
> print(indmin)
>
> But this does not lead to spectacular improvements
> (obviously, this is dependent on the function and the length
> of x, and this dmat does not seem to be an elegant solution
> to me). Is there scope for substantial improvement? Any
> pointers will be greatly appreciated. Below an example with
> some timings.
>
>
> > set.seed(12345)
> > x <- rnorm(1000, mean = 5, sd = 2)
> > xord<-x[order(x)]
> >
> > system.time({i<-1
> + meanmin<-Inf
> + while (i<length(x)) {
> + ind<-x<xord[i]
> + if ((mean(x*ind)+mean(x*!ind))<meanmin) {
> + meanmin<-mean(x*ind)+mean(x*!ind)
> + indmin<-xord[i]
> + }
> + i<-i+1
> + }
> + print(indmin)})
> [1] 3.826595
> user system elapsed
> 0.14 0.00 0.14
> >
> >
> >
> > system.time({dmat<-outer(x,xord,"<")*1
> + ss<-apply(dmat,2,function (z) mean(x*z)+mean(x*!z))
> + indmin<-xord[which.min(ss)]
> + print(indmin)})
> [1] 3.826595
> user system elapsed
> 0.42 0.06 0.49
> >
> >
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help op stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list