[R] slightly extended lm class

[ivo welch]

obviously not.  any other suggestion?  of course, it would be even
better if someone who knew what he is doing were to add this
functionality on demand (e.g., optional parameters) to the standard lm
classes.  just a thought...

On 1/1/07, Michael Kubovy <kubovy at virginia.edu> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2007, at 9:00 PM, ivo welch wrote:
>
> > I have written a short lme.R function, which adds normalized
> > coefficients and White heteroskedasticity-adjusted statistics to the
> > standard output.  Otherwise, it behaves like lm.
>
> Is it a good idea to call it lme, since there's a widely used lme()
> in the nlme package?
> _____________________________
> Professor Michael Kubovy
> University of Virginia
> Department of Psychology
> USPS:     P.O.Box 400400    Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400
> Parcels:    Room 102        Gilmer Hall
>          McCormick Road    Charlottesville, VA 22903
> Office:    B011    +1-434-982-4729
> Lab:        B019    +1-434-982-4751
> Fax:        +1-434-982-4766
> WWW:    http://www.people.virginia.edu/~mk9y/
>
>
>