[R] merge words=data name
Mark W Kimpel
mwkimpel at gmail.com
Mon Feb 12 02:57:08 CET 2007
Both yours and Gabor's methods were far superior to mine. I am curious
why you like Gabor's better than yours. From the perspective of someone
who uses R regularly but has only read about C, yours seems more
"R-like". Would Gabor's be more computationally efficient if the loop
was big enough?
I ask this because it made me ask myself, "are the C-like functions of R
'better' (computationally) than the more R-like ones?"
Am I making sense?
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 2/11/2007 4:17 PM, Robert McFadden wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch at stats.uwo.ca]
>> I would like to thank everybody very much for help, but especially for
>> Duncan - it works wonderful.
> You're welcome, but I have to say I like Gabor's solution better than
> mine, assuming that M3 is fixed.
> Duncan Murdoch
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Mark W. Kimpel MD
Department of Psychiatry
Indiana University School of Medicine
More information about the R-help