[R] perception of graphical data

David James daj025 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 19:58:38 CEST 2007


Hi,

You may want to check chapter 4 ("Graphical Perception") in W. S.
Cleveland (1985?)  "The Elements of Graphing Data" and the references
he includes.

Regards,

--
David

On 8/24/07, Yeh, Richard C <richard.c.yeh at bankofamerica.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I apologize that this is off-topic.  I am seeking information on
> perception of graphical data, in an effort to improve the plots I
> produce.  Would anyone point me to literature reviews in this area?  (Or
> keywords to try on google?)  Is this located somewhere near cognitive
> science, psychology, human factors research?
>
> For example, some specific questions I have are:
>
> I recall as a child when I first saw a map where the areas of the
> containers (geographical states) were drawn as rectangles, proportional
> to a quantity other than land area.  Does anyone know of an algorithm
> for drawing such maps?  Would anyone know of a journal or reference
> where I can find studies on whether subjects reading these maps can
> accurately assess the meaning of the different areas, as [some of us]
> can assess different heights on a bar graph?  (What about areas in bar
> graphs with non-uniform widths?)
>
> Scatter plots of microarray data often attempt to represent thousands or
> tens of thousands of points, but all I read from them are density and
> distribution --- the gene names cannot be shown.  At what point, would a
> sunflowerplot-like display or a smooth gradient be better?  When two
> data points drawn as 50% gray disks are small and tangent, are they
> perceptually equivalent to a single, 100% black disk?  Or a 50% gray
> disk with twice the area?  What problems are known about plotting with
> disks --- do viewers use the area or the diameter (or neither) to gauge
> weight?
>
>
> As you can tell, I'm a non-expert, mixing issues of data interpretation,
> visual perception, graphic representation.  Previously, I didn't have
> the flexibility of R's graphics, so I didn't need to think so much.
> I've read some of Edward S. Tufte's books, but found them more
> qualitative than quantitative.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Richard
>
> 212-933-3305 / richard.c.yeh at bankofamerica.com
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>



More information about the R-help mailing list