[R] Does anyone else think this might be worth a warning?!?
m.g.walker at massey.ac.nz
Sun Aug 19 08:40:23 CEST 2007
I was *very* surprised by this little trick for new players: mean() only
considers its first argument!
I found this very different behaviour to max():
Perhaps this is the wrong list to ask, but does anyone else think this a
little on the interesting side? Is it not possible to detect a first
argument of length one in the presence of other un-named arguments and
at least produce a warning?
More information about the R-help