[R] invert 160000x160000 matrix
Moshe Olshansky
m_olshansky at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 14 03:09:40 CEST 2007
While inverting the matrix may be a problem, if you
need to solve an equation A*x = b you do not need to
invert A, there exist iterative methods which do need
A or inv(A) - all you need to provide is a function
that computes A*x for an arbitrary vector x.
For such a large matrix this may be slow but possible.
--- Paul Gilbert <pgilbert at bank-banque-canada.ca>
wrote:
> I don't think you can define a matrix this large in
> R, even if you have
> the memory. Then, of course, inverting it there may
> be other programs
> that have limitations.
>
> Paul
>
> Jiao Yang wrote:
> > Can R invert a 160000x160000 matrix with all
> positive numbers? Thanks a lot!
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained,
> reproducible code.
>
====================================================================================
>
> La version française suit le texte anglais.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This email may contain privileged and/or
> confidential inform...{{dropped}}
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained,
> reproducible code.
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list