[R] plotting all subgroups with augPred
Spencer Graves
spencer.graves at pdf.com
Fri Sep 29 17:30:34 CEST 2006
You want an 'augPred' plot with multiple lines per panel, from
multiple factors in the model? Because you provided such a simple,
self-contained example, I can offer much more substantive comments than
I might have otherwise. First the bad news: I don't see an easy way to
get what you want. Good news: I think I can outline for you a
moderately simple but still not trivial way to get it -- though I
haven't completed the exercise myself.
The 'augPred' documentation includes an example with two lines per
panel, but one of the lines is just the 'fixed' model, which is the same
in all frames. That's not what you want.
To dig deeper, I typed 'augPred' at a command prompt: It's a one
line function consisting of 'UseMethod("augPred")'. This pushed me to
do the following:
> methods("augPred")
[1] augPred.gls* augPred.lme* augPred.lmList*
This led me to try "getAnywhere(augPred.lme)", which listed out
the function. I decided I wanted to walk through the function line by
line, so I tried the following:
> debug(augPred.lme)
Error: object "augPred.lme" not found
Since 'augPred' is in library(nlme), I refined this as follows:
> debug(nlme:::augPred.lme)
This worked. Next I tried to execute your command
'augPred(fm1Pixel)', which put me into 'augPred.lme'. From there, one
can walk through the function line by line, looking at what they do,
etc. Later, you can do the execute your own modification to that code
outside of a call to 'augPred'. If you get 'object ... not found', try
adding 'nlme:::' as a prefix to '...'. If you do this, you will find
that 'augPred' basically does three things:
1. Creates a data.frame 'value' containing the explanatory
variables for which predictions are needed. You need to add a column
for 'Side' to 'value'; I don't see a way to do this in the function call.
2. Call 'pred <- predict(...)' to get the numbers required for
the lines.
3. Reorganize things so 'plot.augPred' knows what to do.
After you get 'pred' with all the numbers you need, you can plot
them any way you want.
Hope this helps.
Spencer Graves
Afshartous, David wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a question RE plotting the prediction lines of a random effects
> model via augPred. I'll illustrate via the Pixel dataset within the
> nlme package:
>
> library(nlme)
> attach(Pixel)
> fm1Pixel = lme(pixel ~ day + I(day^2), data = Pixel, random = list(Dog =
> ~ 1))
> plot(augPred(fm1Pixel)) ### 10 fitted lines since there are 10 dogs
>
> fm2Pixel = update(fm1Pixel, . ~ . + Side)
> plot(augPred(fm2Pixel)) ## also produces 10 fitted lines
>
> For the second plot, shouldn't we have 2 fitted lines per dog, one for
> each level
> of the fixed effect Side?
>
> 1) How does one plot insure that this is plotted accordingly?
>
> 2) How does one plot say only the first 5 dogs?
>
>
> Thanks!
> Dave
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list