[R] acos(0.5) == pi/3 FALSE
Charles C. Berry
cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu
Wed Sep 20 17:54:10 CEST 2006
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Johannes Hüsing wrote:
> Peter Dalgaard:
>> Ben Bolker <bolker at zoo.ufl.edu> writes:
>>> 1. compose your response
>> I've always wondered why step 1. - often the time-consuming bit - is not
>> listed last.
>
> The advice applies to the situation when answering immediately would be
> your knee-jerk reaction. It is assumed that actually composing and sending
> the mail would take very little time and thought, whereas coming around to
> answering it after runif(1)*4 hours would take considerably more time, even
> when mulitiplied with the probability that you are still the first one.
>
> Looking at the submission times of questions and answers in this
> particular case, though, I would be upset if the helpful guys actually
> used this algorithm. Most of the answers were submitted after 3.5 to 4 h
> time, thus revealing a possible flaw of the random number generator
> underlying runif().
Johannes,
Turn on 'full-headers' in your email reader.
Most of the replies were submitted within 20 minutes of the posting of the
original query by the list-serv (to me and I assume to others) and several
that said essentially the same thing were posted within the first 10
minutes, I recall.
The list-serv held the initial email for a couple of hours before passing
it on. The replies are processed more rapidly, being held at most a few
minutes each.
Given the initial hold placed on that email, runif(1)*4 hours would have
increased the overall response time (from time of initial posting to time
of first response) by less than 25% (with high probability). And would
have saved several respondents from having to type up their replies.
In this case even runif(1)*20 minutes would likely have cut the response
traffic to one or two and would have increased the overall response time
by less than 10 minutes.
Chuck
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
Charles C. Berry (858) 534-2098
Dept of Family/Preventive Medicine
E mailto:cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu UC San Diego
http://biostat.ucsd.edu/~cberry/ La Jolla, San Diego 92093-0717
More information about the R-help
mailing list