[R] binom.test
(Ted Harding)
Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk
Thu Oct 19 17:53:23 CEST 2006
On 19-Oct-06 Ethan Johnsons wrote:
> R-experts:
>
> A quick question, please.
>
>>From a lab exp, I got 12 positives out of 50.
> To get 90% CI for this , I think binom.test might be
> the one to be used.
> Is there a better way or function to calculate this?
What do you mean by "better"? For a symmetrical 2-sided
exact binomial confidence interval, binom.test gives the
result quickly and, to within the precision of pbinom,
correctly (as I've just verified by hand!).
And you can get 1-sided CIs by setting the 'alternative'
option, or asymmetrical CI's by finding the two 1-sided
CIs (e.g. for conf.level = 0.03 and 0.07) that you want.
What do you want to improve on?
>> binom.test(x=12, n=50, p=12/50, conf.level = 0.90)
>
> Exact binomial test
>
> data: 12 and 50
> number of successes = 12, number of trials = 50, p-value = 1
> alternative hypothesis: true probability of success is not equal to
> 0.24
> 90 percent confidence interval:
> 0.1447182 0.3596557
r<-12 ; n<-50
1-pbinom(r-1,n, 0.14471815)
[1] 0.04999999
1-pbinom(r-1,n, 0.14471816)
[1] 0.05000001
pbinom(r,n, 0.35965569)
[1] 0.05000001
pbinom(r,n, 0.35965570)
[1] 0.05
pbinom(r,n, 0.35965571)
[1] 0.04999998
> sample estimates:
> probability of success
> 0.24
>
> thx much
>
> ej
Best wishes,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 19-Oct-06 Time: 16:53:19
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
More information about the R-help
mailing list