[R] R-OT list needed?

[Liaw, Andy]

> From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
> 
> On 19 May 2006 at 14:20, (Ted Harding) wrote:
> | than you, what that seems to spell out -- maybe "R-Social"
> | might be better).

A ROT-SIG list?
 
> Perfect!  Those with bruises from asking silly or uninformed 
> questions on r-help can refer to that list as ... R-AntiSocial.
> 
> Just kidding. I'd be up for an off-topic list with a more 
> discerning look at publically fudged and quoted numbers.  
> Carl Bialik does something related in his "Numbers Guy" 
> column at the on-line Wall Street Journal, but that requires 
> a subscription.

For more such statistics (and if you've got 24 minutes to spare),
see http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-869183917758574879.

Andy
 
> Dirk
> 
> --
> Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
>                                                   -- Thomas A. Edison
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! 
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> 
>