[R] Wikis etc.
J Dougherty
jwd at surewest.net
Tue Jan 10 02:38:36 CET 2006
On Monday 09 January 2006 11:31, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> . . .
>
> I certainly was not disparaging books. I said _in addition to_ books,
> not _insted of_. The reason I pointed this out is that I think
> most people already read the books. What many people don't
> do as far as can tell is read the code. Obviously if you are just
> starting out you are going to be relying on the documentation,
> books, etc. but once you get past the intro stage you need to get
> into code. One repeatedly sees questions on this list where just
> a minute or two spent with the code would have answered the
> question.
>
Gabor,
The issue IS the INTRO stage though, in fact well beyond the intro stage.
Reading the code is well and good for a programmer, but many are not and
never will be coders, and this group is going to continue to expand. Even an
advanced statistician migrating from a proprietary system like SPSS to R is
going to need documentation. They would not even know where in the code to
look! Code is cool, but it really isn't expository.
John
More information about the R-help
mailing list