[R] A comment about R:
ggrothendieck at gmail.com
Tue Jan 3 20:37:36 CET 2006
On 1/3/06, Thomas Lumley <tlumley at u.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> > One thing that is often overlooked, and hasn't yet been mentioned in
> > the thread, is how much *simpler* R can be for certain completely
> > basic tasks of practical or pedagogical relevance: Calculate a simple
> > derived statistic, confidence intervals from estimate and SE,
> > percentage points of the binomial distribution - using dbinom or from
> > the formula, take the sum of each of 10 random samples from a set of
> > numbers, etc. This is where other packages get stuck in the
> > procedure+dataset mindset.
> Some of these things are actually fairly straightforward in Stata. For
In fact there are some things that are very easy
to do in Stata and can be done in R but only with more difficulty.
For example, consider this introductory session in Stata:
Looking at the first few queries,
see how easy it is to take the top few in Stata whereas in R one would
have a complex use of order. Its not hard in R to write a function
that would make it just as easy but its not available off the top
of one's head though RSiteSearch("sort.data.frame") will find one
if one knew what to search for.
More information about the R-help