[R] wilcox.test returned estimates
Torsten Hothorn
Torsten.Hothorn at rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
Wed Feb 15 12:59:01 CET 2006
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, pmt1rew at leeds.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have being using wilcox.test to test for differences between 2 independent
> samples. I had understood the difference in location to be conventionally the
> difference in the sample medians however this is not the case when implemented
> in R. I have tied ranks and therefore non-exact p-value and confidence
> intervals are calculated due to the normal approximation. But what exactly is
> this normal approximation i.e. how is it involved in estimating the location
> difference?
the reference distribution is not involved in _estimating_ the difference
in location. `wilcox.test' implements the Hodges-Lehmann estimator:
from `stats/R/wilcox.test.R'
## Exact confidence interval for the location parameter
## mean(x) - mean(y) in the two-sample case (cf. the
## one-sample case).
alpha <- 1 - conf.level
diffs <- sort(outer(x, y, "-"))
...
ESTIMATE <- median(diffs)
names(ESTIMATE) <- "difference in location"
which simply is the median of all pairwise differences.
However, the usual normal approximation to the exact conditional
distribution (in case of ties) of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistic
(see Hajek, Sidak, Sen for example) is involved in computing a confidence
interval for the difference in location.
Hope that helps,
Torsten
>
> Further, is it then wrong to refer to the difference in location as the
> difference between the medians? Does anyone have a more appropriate
> description?
>
> Thanks
>
> Rebecca
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list