[R] Use of least-squares means, are they misleading?

Felipe felipe at unileon.es
Mon Sep 19 16:03:41 CEST 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thank you, I will try there.
Felipe

Peter Flom wrote:
| Felipe
|
| I doubt you will get much response on this list, although it's an
| interesting question.  You might try asking it on another list.  Some
| that often have discussions of such topics are
|
| SAS-L
| EDSTAT-L and
| STAT-L
|
| Regards
|
| Peter
|
| Peter L. Flom, PhD
| Assistant Director, Statistics and Data Analysis Core
| Center for Drug Use and HIV Research
| National Development and Research Institutes
| 71 W. 23rd St
| http://cduhr.ndri.org
| www.peterflom.com
| New York, NY 10010
| (212) 845-4485 (voice)
| (917) 438-0894 (fax)
|
|
|
|>>>Felipe <felipe at unileon.es> 09/19/05 6:39 AM >>>
|
| Hi.
| Sorry for sending this question twice, but I would really like to know
| your opinion on this topic.
|
| I have been reading about the (in)convenience of using least-squares
| means (a. k. a. adjusted means) in multiple comparisons (I used to
| resort to them when using SAS). I even read a post in this list warning
| against them, but not giving much detail.
|
| What is your opinion? Should I avoid using LSmeans for comparison (e.g.
| after ANOVA)?
|
| Greetings.
|
| Felipe
|
| ______________________________________________
| R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
| https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
| PLEASE do read the posting guide!
| http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
|
|

______________________________________________
R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide!
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAkMuxT0ACgkQWtdQtNzjBl7LWACcCddjPgTnZX2+15aDLbxe+qxD
rHcAoIdkgW8ke/M8bb7pSlcptTz9K53j
=eCEC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the R-help mailing list