[R] significance of spectal peak with spectrum()
Suresh Krishna
ssk2031 at columbia.edu
Fri Sep 16 12:06:05 CEST 2005
I am very much a naive and interested beginner, so I am not at all sure
if you will find this reference
http://snipurl.com/hq2j
interesting....
S.
Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Sebastian Leuzinger wrote:
>
>
>>the null hypothesis would be: one particular frequency peak is not
>>significantly different from the background noise.
>
>
> So you want to know, e.g., whether there is something going on at 1000
> Hz? This is difficult: If you are considering the periodogram to be a
> density, then you do not know the distribution of the value of a single
> frequency, because it depends on the stuff going on at other frequencies.
>
> Second point is (and already asked): "Kind of [background] noise"?
>
> The only really easy test is for the Null "signal is white noise", hence
> H1 is "at least one non-white-noisy frequency".
>
> [If somebody knows a really good book or papers that cover other cases
> than the trivial one mentioned above, I am very interested to hear about
> them, BTW.]
>
> If you have another kind of noise (such as blue or pink noise), things
> become even worse.
>
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>>On Friday 16 September 2005 09:28, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sebastian Leuzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello, has anybody got a simple recepie to test the significance level of
>>>>the peaks after using spectrum() ?
>>>
>>>What is you null hypothesis?
>>>
>>>- Kind of noise?
>>>- One particular frequency is noisy or all noisy?
>>>- ...
>>>
>>>Uwe Ligges
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>(R-version 2.0.1, linux SuSE9.3)
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list