[R] Removing and restoring factor levels (TYPO CORRECTED)
Marc Schwartz (via MN)
mschwartz at mn.rr.com
Thu Oct 13 19:07:55 CEST 2005
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 10:02 -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Sorry, a typo in my previous message (parens in the wrong place in the
> conversion).
>
> Here it is corrected:
>
> I'm doing a big slow computation, and profiling shows that it is
> spending a lot of time in match(), apparently because I have code like
>
> x %in% listofxvals
>
> Both x and listofxvals are factors with the same levels, so I could
> probably speed this up by stripping off the levels and just treating
> them as integer vectors, then restoring the levels at the end.
>
> What is the safest way to do this? I am worried that at some point x
> and listofxvals will *not* have the same levels, and the optimization
> will give the wrong answer. So I need code that guarantees they have
> the same coding.
>
> I think this works, where "master" is a factor with the master list of
> levels (guaranteed to be a superset of the levels of x and listofxvals),
> but can anyone spot anything that might go wrong?
>
> # Strip the levels
> x <- as.integer( factor(x, levels = levels(master) ) )
>
> # Restore the levels
> x <- structure( x, levels = levels(master), class = "factor" )
>
> Thanks for any advice...
>
> Duncan Murdoch
Duncan,
With the predicate that 'master' has the full superset of all possible
factor levels defined, it would seem that this would be a reasonable way
to go.
This approach would also seem to eliminate whatever overhead is
encountered as a result of the coercion of 'x' as a factor to a
character vector, which is done by match().
One question I have is, what is the advantage of using structure()
versus:
x <- factor(x, levels = levels(master))
?
Thanks,
Marc
More information about the R-help
mailing list