[R] Hypatia?? [Was: Adding Two Vectors (was: no subject)]

Marc Schwartz MSchwartz at mn.rr.com
Sat Nov 5 18:40:58 CET 2005


On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 17:52 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
> >>>>> "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz at mn.rr.com>
> >>>>>     on Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:20:40 -0600 writes:
> 
>     Marc> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 15:15 +0000, Ted Harding wrote:
>     >> On 05-Nov-05 Marc Schwartz wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-01 at
>     >> 12:39 +0200, Erez wrote: >> Hi
> 
>     >> > [I did not see a reply to this. The date indicates that
>     >>    it was sent on  Tuesday, but I just got it today]
>     >> 
>     >> This looks like a problam with hypatia:
>     >> 
>     >> [2]: Received: from hypatia.math.ethz.ch (hypatia
>     >> [129.132.145.15]) by hypatia.math.ethz.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4)
>     >> with ESMTP id jA5ERVxZ007442; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 15:31:49
>     >> +0100
>     >> 
>     >> [1]: Received: from sa4.bezeqint.net (sa4.bezeqint.net
>     >> [192.115.104.18]) by hypatia.math.ethz.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4)
>     >> with ESMTP id jA1AdRni004238 for
>     >> <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch>; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:39:27
>     >> +0100
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     >> Ted.
> 
>     Marc> Ted,
> 
>     Marc> Agreed. There were a couple of other delayed posts
>     Marc> that came through as well.
> 
>     Marc> I added Martin here, as an FYI.
> 
>     Marc> Thanks,
> 
>     Marc> Marc
> 
> No problems with Hypatia, just with Martin ...
> He has been away at a nice workshop in Treviso
> "Robust Statistics and R" and then at the CSDA conference in
> Cyprus.  After coming back he has been quite busy and only today
> found time to act as mailing list moderator to approve those
> e-mails that were filtered accidentally ("False positives").   
> For some reasons, our spam filter recently gives e-mails from
> Yahoo and Hotmail a relatively too high spammyness score;  if
> you additionally send "HTML"ified e-mails, chances have become pretty
> high your mail won't get through.  And, BTW, only some of them will
> occasionally be manually approved by me.
> 
> Martin

Thanks for the clarification Martin.

Is there a benign (time sparing) way of tagging these messages when they
come through, so that is can be known, first and foremost, that they
required manual intervention? The goal being to modify posting behavior
and to ultimately minimize the amount of your time that is required on
these?

Hope that your travels and the meetings were enjoyable!

Best regards,

Marc




More information about the R-help mailing list