[R] mixtures as outcome variables
Greg Snow
greg.snow at ihc.com
Wed Mar 23 18:52:57 CET 2005
>> >>> "Jason W. Martinez" <jmartinez5 at verizon.net> 03/22/05 04:11PM
>>>
>> Dear R-users,
>>
>> I have an outcome variable and I'm unsure about how to treat it.
Any
>> advice?
Below are a couple of ideas/suggestions of things to think about
>>
>> I have spending data for each county in the state of California
(N=58).
>> Each county has been allocated money to spend on any one of the
>> following four categories: A, B, C, and D.
>>
>> Each county may spend the money in any way they see fit. This also
means
>> that the county need not spend all the money that was allocated to
them.
>> The data structure looks something like the one below:
You might want to include a category for the amout of money not spent
(for
a total of 5 possibilities).
>> COUNTY A B C D Total
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> alameda 2534221 1555592 2835475 3063249 9988537
>> alpine 3174 8500 0 45558 55232
>> amador 0 0 0 0 0
>> ....
>>
>>
>> The goal is to explain variation in spending patterns, which are
>> presumably the result of characteristics for each county.
Do you have data representing these characteristics? The predictor
values
in a regression type model?
Starting with some good graphics may help determine and show
interesting patterns.
The maptools package can read in shapefiles and plot the maps. You can
download a shapefile with the county boundaries from:
http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/co2000.html
Then you could use the symbols function to plot a star in the center of
each
county (use get.Pcent from maptools to find the coordinates of the
centers).
Then just look for groups of counties with similar looking stars, or
stars that
are different from those close by (I would use the percentage spent in
each
category for the lengths of the star spokes).
Another graph that may prove interesting is the trilinear plot (see the
article
in Chance from the summer of 2002). Combine your categories into 3
groups
(e.g. A&B vs. C&D vs. not spent; or A vs. B vs. all others) then plot
each county's
spending on the trilinear plot (functions to do the plot are:
triangle.plot in ade4,
triplot in klaR, or I have some code that I wrote (not on CRAN yet)).
Look for clusters of counties in these plots.
>> I may treat the problem like a simple linear regression problem for
each
>> category, but by definition, money spent in one category will take
away
>> the amount of money that can be spent in any other category---and
each
>> county is not allocated the same amount of money to spend.
>>
>> I have constructed proportions of amount spent on each category and
have
>> conducted quasibinomial regression, on each dependent outcome but
that
>> does not seem very convincing to me.
>>
>> Would anyone have any advice about how to treat an outcome variable
of
>> this sort?
Here are a couple of thoughts (there may be better options).
Assuming that you have some predictor (x) variables about each county:
use the multinom function in the nnet package, the idea being that each
dollar spent follows a multinomial with certain probabilities as to
which category
it will be spent in and the predictors tell you what the probabilities
are.
Similarly you could use package rpart to do a tree model, use the
category as the
outcome and the percentage spent on the category as the weights (each
county
would be spread accross 4 or 5 lines of the dataset with the predictors
replicated
on each line). rpart gives the probabilities/proportions for each
category based
on splits of the predictor variables.
>> Thanks for any hints!
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jason W. Martinez, Gradaute Student
>> University of California, Riverside
>> Department of Sociology
>> E-mail: jmartinez5 at verizon.net
>>
hope this helps,
Greg Snow, Ph.D.
Statistical Data Center
greg.snow at ihc.com
(801) 408-8111
More information about the R-help
mailing list