[R] possible bug in merge with duplicate blank names in 'by' field.
Frank Gibbons
fgibbons at hms.harvard.edu
Thu Jun 16 23:59:56 CEST 2005
Run this:
>p <- c('a', 'c', '', ''); a <- c(10, 20, 30, 40); d1 <-
>data.frame(Promoter=p, ip=a) # Note duplicate empty names in p.
>p <- c('b', 'c', 'd', ''); a <- c(15, 20, 30, 40); d2 <-
>data.frame(Promoter=p, ip=a)
>all <- merge(x=d1, y=d2, by="Promoter", all=T)
>all <- merge(x=all, y=d2, by="Promoter", all=T)
>all
Data is this:
>d1
> Promoter ip
>1 a 10
>2 c 20
>3 30
>4 40
>
>d2
> Promoter ip
>1 b 15
>2 c 20
>3 d 30
>4 40
Output looks like this:
> Promoter ip.x ip.y ip
>1 40 30 30
>2 40 40 30
>3 40 30 40
>4 40 40 40
>5 b 15 NA NA
>6 c 20 20 20
>7 d 30 NA NA
>8 a NA 10 10
The weird thing about this is (in my view) that each instance of '' is
considered unique, so with each successive merge, all combinatorial
possibilities are explored, like a SQL outer join (Cartesian product). For
non-empty names, an inner join is performed.
Dealing with genomic data (10^4 datapoints), it's easy to have a couple of
blanks buried in the middle of things, and to combine several replicates
with successive merges. I couldn't understand how my three replicates of
6000 points, in which I expected substantial overlap in the labels, were
taking so long to merge and ultimately generating 57000 labels. The culprit
turned out to be a few hundred blanks buried in the middle.
Why does the empty ("null") name merit special treatment? Perhaps I'm
missing something. I hesitate to submit this as a bug, since technically I
guess you could say that blank names, especially duplicates, are not
kosher. But on the other hand, this combinatorial behaviour seems to occur
only for blanks.
-Frank
PhD, Computational Biologist,
Harvard Medical School BCMP/SGM-322, 250 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02115, USA.
Tel: 617-432-3555 Fax:
617-432-3557 http://llama.med.harvard.edu/~fgibbons
More information about the R-help
mailing list