[R] Problem specifying "function" for "mle" operation
Peter Dalgaard
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Wed Jul 27 11:34:24 CEST 2005
"Narcyz Ghinea" <Narcyz.Ghinea at swsahs.nsw.gov.au> writes:
> MY THEORY:
>
> I think it has something to do with the fact that the function
> argument is a vector in CASE 2. Hope this doesn't mean I have to
> re-write the function in a way that it doesn't require vector
> inputs.....
You do. The innards of mle has
f <- function(p) {
l <- as.list(p)
names(l) <- nm
l[n] <- fixed
do.call("minuslogl", l)
}
which converts the parameters to a list before calling the likelihood.
> Any suggestions on how to make CASE 2 work would be appreciated.
Well, either you conform or you patch mle to handle functions with
vector parameters....
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-help
mailing list