[R] different result from the same errorest() in library( ipred)

Liu, Xin Xin.Liu at arradx.com
Thu Jan 6 15:01:18 CET 2005


Dear all,

Does anybody can explain this: different results got when all the same parameters are used in the errorest() in library ipred, as the following?

errorest(Species ~ ., data=iris, model=randomForest, estimator = "cv", est.para=control.errorest(k=3),  mtry=2)$err 
[1] 0.03333333
> errorest(Species ~ ., data=iris, model=randomForest, estimator = "cv", est.para=control.errorest(k=3),  mtry=2)$err 
[1] 0.04
> errorest(Species ~ ., data=iris, model=randomForest, estimator = "cv", est.para=control.errorest(k=3),  mtry=2)$err 
[1] 0.05333333
> errorest(Species ~ ., data=iris, model=randomForest, estimator = "cv", est.para=control.errorest(k=3),  mtry=2)$err 
[1] 0.05333333
> errorest(Species ~ ., data=iris, model=randomForest, estimator = "cv", est.para=control.errorest(k=3),  mtry=2)$err 
[1] 0.04666667
> errorest(Species ~ ., data=iris, model=randomForest, estimator = "cv", est.para=control.errorest(k=3),  mtry=2)$err 
[1] 0.05333333
> errorest(Species ~ ., data=iris, model=randomForest, estimator = "cv", est.para=control.errorest(k=3),  mtry=2)$err 
[1] 0.04
> 

Xin LIU

This e-mail is from ArraDx Ltd

The e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidentia...{{dropped}}




More information about the R-help mailing list