[R] Surprising Behavior of 'tapply'
Carlos Ortega
carlos_ortegafernandez at yahoo.es
Thu Feb 3 19:56:06 CET 2005
Hi,
That is something strange, I could not replicate it...
Regards,
Carlos.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> version
_
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
os mingw32
system i386, mingw32
status
major 2
minor 0.1
year 2004
month 11
day 15
language R
> sex <- rep(c("F", "M"), 5)
> income <- c(rep("low", 5), rep("high", 5))
> count <- 1:10
> mydf <- as.data.frame(cbind(sex, income, count))
> mydf$count = as.numeric(as.character(mydf$count))
> tapply(mydf$count, list(mydf$sex, mydf$income),
FUN=sum)
high low
F 16 9
M 24 6
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--- "Rau, Roland" <Rau at demogr.mpg.de> escribió:
> Dear all,
>
> I wanted to make a two-way-table of two variables
> with a counting
> variable stored in another column of a dataframe. In
> version 1.9.1, the
> behavior is as expected as shown in the simplified
> example code.
>
> > sex <- rep(c("F", "M"), 5)
> > income <- c(rep("low", 5), rep("high", 5))
> > count <- 1:10
> > mydf <- as.data.frame(cbind(sex, income, count))
> > mydf$count = as.numeric(as.character(mydf$count))
> > tapply(mydf$count, list(mydf$sex, mydf$income),
> FUN=sum)
> high low
> F 16 9
> M 24 6
> > version
> _
> platform i386-pc-mingw32
> arch i386
> os mingw32
> system i386, mingw32
> status
> major 1
> minor 9.1
> year 2004
> month 06
> day 21
> language R
> >
>
> In version 2.0.1, however, I get the following
> output:
>
> > sex <- rep(c("F", "M"), 5)
> > income <- c(rep("low", 5), rep("high", 5))
> > count <- 1:10
> > mydf <- as.data.frame(cbind(sex, income, count))
> > mydf$count = as.numeric(as.character(mydf$count))
> > tapply(mydf$count, list(mydf$sex, mydf$income),
> FUN=sum)
> Error in get(x, envir, mode, inherits) : variable
> "FUN" was not found
> > version
> _
> platform i386-pc-mingw32
> arch i386
> os mingw32
> system i386, mingw32
> status
> major 2
> minor 0.1
> year 2004
> month 11
> day 15
> language R
> >
>
> Was this change in behavior intended with the
> changes in tapply from
> R1.9.1 to R2.0.1?
> Is the R-help-list appropriate or rather R-Devel?
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
>
>
>
> +++++
> This mail has been sent through the MPI for
> Demographic Rese...{{dropped}}
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list