[R] if(foo == TRUE) .. etc
bogdan romocea
br44114 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 19:26:33 CEST 2005
Great suggestion; it made me change all my Ts/Fs to TRUE/FALSE.
Given
F <- TRUE
T <- FALSE
is it possible to forbid T to stand for TRUE, and F for FALSE in
function(...,something=T)?
Or, alternatively, never allow F <- whatever and T <- whatever?
I don't know what the technical side is, but I think it would be much
better if this particular blunder (major, yet rather easy to overlook)
was impossible to make.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Maechler [mailto:maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:31 AM
To: R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [R] if(foo == TRUE) .. etc
>>>>> "Andy" == Andy Bunn <abunn at whrc.org>
>>>>> on Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:27:04 -0400 writes:
.....
Andy> is.tuesday <- as.POSIXlt(Sys.time())$wday == 2
Andy> if (is.tuesday == T) { ....}
.....
aaah, this really hurts my eyes or rather the brain behind!
And it's by far not the first such instance...
Rather use " if (is.tuesday) { .... } "
More generally, please, please, everyone :
Replace
if (something == TRUE)
with if (something)
and
if (something.or.other == FALSE)
with if (!something.or.other)
{and even more for cases where you have
'T' and 'F' instead of 'TRUE' and 'FALSE' -
which is against all recommendations, since
F <- TRUE
T <- FALSE
are valid statements, probably not common, but think what
happens when you accidentally have the equivalent of "T <- 0"
somewhere in your global enviroment!
}
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
______________________________________________
R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
More information about the R-help
mailing list