[R] negetative AIC values: How to compare models with negative AIC's
Jan Verbesselt
Jan.Verbesselt at biw.kuleuven.be
Fri Apr 15 16:43:31 CEST 2005
Dear,
When fitting the following model
knots <- 5
lrm.NDWI <- lrm(m.arson ~ rcs(NDWI,knots)
I obtain the following result:
Logistic Regression Model
lrm(formula = m.arson ~ rcs(NDWI, knots))
Frequencies of Responses
0 1
666 35
Obs Max Deriv Model L.R. d.f. P C Dxy
Gamma Tau-a R2 Brier
701 5e-07 34.49 4 0 0.777 0.553
0.563 0.053 0.147 0.045
Coef S.E. Wald Z P
Intercept -4.627 3.188 -1.45 0.1467
NDWI 5.333 20.724 0.26 0.7969
NDWI' 6.832 74.201 0.09 0.9266
NDWI'' 10.469 183.915 0.06 0.9546
NDWI''' -190.566 254.590 -0.75 0.4541
When analysing the glm fit of the same model
Call: glm(formula = m.arson ~ rcs(NDWI, knots), x = T, y = T)
Coefficients:
(Intercept) rcs(NDWI, knots)NDWI rcs(NDWI, knots)NDWI'
rcs(NDWI, knots)NDWI'' rcs(NDWI, knots)NDWI'''
0.02067 0.08441 -0.54307
3.99550 -17.38573
Degrees of Freedom: 700 Total (i.e. Null); 696 Residual
Null Deviance: 33.25
Residual Deviance: 31.76 AIC: -167.7
A negative AIC occurs!
How can the negative AIC from different models be compared with each other?
Is this result logical? Is the lowest AIC still correct?
Thanks,
Jan
_______________________________________________________________________
ir. Jan Verbesselt
Research Associate
Lab of Geomatics Engineering K.U. Leuven
Vital Decosterstraat 102. B-3000 Leuven Belgium
Tel: +32-16-329750 Fax: +32-16-329760
http://gloveg.kuleuven.ac.be/
More information about the R-help
mailing list