[R] Protocol for answering basic questions

Stuart Leask stuart.leask at nottingham.ac.uk
Thu Dec 2 11:57:31 CET 2004

I suspect that a lot of the rationalizing of behaviour that has gone on in
this thread (eg. "terse replies prevent the list being overwhelmed") is just
that and no more. In fact, busy people are taking time to reply as
succinctly as they can. In practice the questioner gets a remarkably rapid,
well-informed response. They may not like its contents for any number of
reasons! Most things in life a worth what you pay for them - the currency
here seems to be whether folks consider that a questioner has made an
effort; if so, respondants seem happy to match it.

I think it is astonishing that the R list maintains such an enthusiastic
body of world-class contributors. I look at many other help lists
(commercial and open-source) and see great oceans of unanswered queries.
Hands up anyone who has time to politely answer swathes of questions already
covered elsewhere. That folks complain that they have not had a reply in 48
hours is a testament to the tremendous effort that is put in.

What I would be in favour of is another list: R-complaints! Here folks with
bruised egos and/or higher expectations of their fellow man can pursue
threads like this one into the next millenium....


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marwan Khawaja" <marwan.khawaja at aub.edu.lb>
To: "'Robert Brown FM CEFAS'" <r.g.brown at cefas.co.uk>;
<r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 8:41 PM
Subject: RE: [R] Protocol for answering basic questions

Well, if you do not like the way some people answer queries, why not just
the reply without reading the response.
Since we're not paying anyone for answering questions, we should be grateful
those who put their time in replying to our basic questions.
And why join this community? -- if you think most are 'conceptually naïve'!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
> [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Robert
> Brown FM CEFAS
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 6:46 PM
> To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: [R] Protocol for answering basic questions
> I have been following the discussions on 'Reasons not to
> answer very basic questions in a straightforward way' with
> interest as someone who is also new to R and has had similar
> experiences.  As such it with sadness that I note that most
> seem to agree with the present approach to the responses to
> basic questions.  I must thank those respondants to my own
> questions who have been helpful, but there are some whose
> replies are in my opinion not only unhelpful but actually
> rude.  Indeed I've now started using Splus instead of R so as
> to have access to a 'proper' support service.  Indeed, the
> main thing I've learned from R is a new respect for the
> values of commercial software and a scepticism regarding free
> software. In the end my experience of r help is that you get
> what you pay for. Many of the so called socratic responses
> (in this list and the wider academic community) can be seen
> as simply way to avoid additional work of a complete reply.
> Experienced R users don't seem to understand how difficult
> the program can be to new users. Responding that the
> questioner should read the 'Introduction to R' or a similar
> document is like  answering a question for directions to
> one's house with 'Buy a map'.  Most likely both such
> questioners have already tried that and are asking because
> that approach failed.  R is a language and like all languages
> it is simple to those that understand it and complex to those
> who do not. Every schoolboy in Spain speaks Spanish, but I
> know from experience that for most English people it is very
> difficult to learn Spanish and take years of study.  If I'm
> asked a question from a novice of a language (be it Spanish
> or R) do I reply 'consult the dictionary'. I would hope not!
> I can tell repondants that whilst many of my basic questions
> may seem simple it is not for lack of studying the very
> sources they refer to.  If only learning was so simple.  I
> suspect that the same is true of most question!
>  ers.
> I speak as someone with a PhD and many years as a researcher
> in my speciality as well as someone close to completing a
> masters in statistics with distinction. As such I am not a
> total novice and would suggest that if I'm having problems so
> are many; and it is not a result of lack of study as so many
> responses seem to suggest.  Indeed it is revealing that
> several responses suggest that they want to discourage
> questions so they don't overwhelm r-help.  Understandable but
> not a recipe to encourage the use of R by other than experts.
> The R community needs to decide of they really only want
> expert statisticians users and make this clear if it is the
> case.  Alternatively if they are to encourage novices the
> present approach is not the way to do it.
> I can appreciate that many of the respondants are busy, but
> if that is the case it would be better if they didn't reply
> at all. I was taught many years ago that if you can't say
> anything nice/useful then to say nothing at all.  Something
> similar could well be applied to this list.  I must say that
> some respondants are very helpful; and I thank them.  Leave
> these simple questions to such people.  Indeed it seems
> surprising that some exteremely experienced R users choose to
> reply to these basic messages at all; and it seem it is
> mostly these people who are rude.  I would have thought it
> might be better for them to concentrate on complex problems
> more suited to their skills and interests and leave the
> simple questions to more sympathetic souls.
> Perhaps there is a case for two r help lists catering to
> basic and advanced questions? Certainly if the R community is
> serious about appealling to users outside advanced
> statisticians there is a need for a change of approach in r
> help and elsewhere.  Russ Ackoff identified much of the
> failure of management science as due to those who were
> 'mathematically sophisticated but conceptually naive' and
> much the same could be said for many in the R community.
> Finally, let me once again thank those who have responded
> helpful to my queries in the past and ask them to continue in
> that vein; their assistance and effort is greatly appreciated.
> **************************************************************
> *********************
> This email and any attachments are intended for the named
> recipient(s) only.  Its unauthorised use, distribution,
> disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.  If you have
> received it in error, please destroy all copies and notify
> the sender.  In messages of a non-business nature, the views
> and opinions expressed are the author's own and do not
> necessarily reflect those of the organisation from which it
> is sent.  All emails may be subject to monitoring.
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
PLEASE do read the posting guide!

This message has been scanned but we cannot guarantee that it and any
attachments are free from viruses or other damaging content: you are
advised to perform your own checks.  Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.

More information about the R-help mailing list