[R] Is R good for not-professional-statistician, un-mathematical clinical researchers?
jawegelin at ucdavis.edu
Thu Aug 19 08:45:05 CEST 2004
Alternate title: How can I persuade my students that R is for them?
Alternate title: Can R replace SAS, SPSS or Stata for clinicians?
I am teaching introductory statistics to twelve physicians and two veterinarians
who have enrolled in a Mentored Clinical Research Training Program. My course is the
first in a sequence of three. We (the instructors of this sequence) chose to teach
R rather than some other computing environment.
My (highly motivated) students have never encountered anything like R. One frankly
"Do you feel (honestly) that a group of physicians (with two vets) clinicians will
be able to effectively use and actually understand R? If so, I will happily call this
bookstore and order this book [Venables and Ripley] tomorrow."
I am heavily biased toward R/S because I have used it since the first applied statistics
course I took. But I would love to give these students some kind of objective information
about the usability of R by non-statisticians--not just my own bias.
Could anyone suggest any such information? Or does anyone on this list use R who is
a clinician and not really mathematically savvy? For instance, someone who doesn't
remember any math beyond algebra and doesn't think in terms of P(A|B)?
Or have we done a disservice to our students by choosing to make them
learn R, rather than making ourselves learn SAS, Stata or SPSS?
Thank you for any ideas
More information about the R-help