[R] Is k equivalent to k:k ?
MSchwartz at MedAnalytics.com
Mon Aug 2 17:14:05 CEST 2004
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 10:09, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> Thus, in the case of:
> identical(4, 4:4)
> the first 4 is of type double, while the 4:4 is of type single. Thus the
> result is FALSE.
Correction. The above sentence should read:
the first 4 is of type double, while the 4:4 is of type **INTEGER**.
Thus the result is FALSE.
Sorry about that. Need more coffee....
More information about the R-help