[R] POSIXct vs Dates
Don MacQueen
macq at llnl.gov
Fri Apr 23 16:06:45 CEST 2004
I can agree with the other responses, and mention that I'm on the
other side of the coin, so to speak.
The *only* reason I tried R to begin with was to find out if it could
handle data whose time scale was in minutes and seconds better than
the other software I was using. With its POSIXt class, which had only
recently been introduced, it was better.
In particular, I needed software that would successfully plot the
data as it crossed the boundary between daylight savings time and
standard time *and* label the time axis with daylight savings time or
standard time as appropriate. R did; the other software did not.
-Don
At 8:20 AM -0400 4/22/04, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
>I noticed the addition of the Dates class for dates without times, in R
>1.9. I am making extensive use of POSIXct at present and would like to
>know whether it is worth changing to Dates. What are a few of the
>trade-offs?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Frank
>---
>Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chair School of Medicine
> Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
>https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
--
--------------------------------------
Don MacQueen
Environmental Protection Department
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, CA, USA
More information about the R-help
mailing list