[R] difference between coxph and cph
Deb Montgomery
mont4260 at uidaho.edu
Wed Apr 21 07:01:36 CEST 2004
Hi. I am using Windows version of R 1.8.1. Being somewhat new to survival
analysis, I am trying to compare cph (Design) with coxph (survival) for use
with a survival data set.
I was wondering why cph and coxph provide me with different confidence
intervals
for the hazard ratios for one of the variables. I was wondering if I am
doing something wrong? Or if the two functions are calculating hazard ratios
and the 95% confidence intervals differently? I have listed part of the code
and part of the results from the 2 functions. Sorry if this question is a
repeat, I didn't find it when I searched the archives.
###########################################################
# s= Surv(Time1, Time2, censor)
#f= coxph(s~ Siblings + Weight.at.age.4)
#summary(f)
#Call:
#coxph(formula = s ~ Siblings + Weight.at.age.4)
# n= 132
# exp(coef) exp(-coef) lower .95 upper .95
#Siblings 1.52 0.657 0.815 2.84
#Weight.at.age.4 0.91 1.099 0.772 1.07
##############################################################
#s= Surv(Time1, Time2, censor)
#f= cph(s~ Siblings + Weight.at.age.4,surv=TRUE , x=T, y = T)
# summary(f)
# Effects Response : s
# Factor Low High Diff. Effect S.E. Lower 0.95 Upper 0.95
# Siblings 0.000 1.000 1.0000 0.42 0.32 -0.20 1.04
# Hazard Ratio 0.000 1.000 1.0000 1.52 NA 0.82 2.84
# Weight.at.age.4 8.613 10.602 1.9885 -0.19 0.17 -0.51 0.14
# Hazard Ratio 8.613 10.602 1.9885 0.83 NA 0.60 1.15
Sincerely
Deb Montgomery
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Resources
University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho 83843
208-885-4008
mont4260 at uidaho.edu
More information about the R-help
mailing list