[R] Unexpected behaviour of identical
Peter Dalgaard
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Mon Apr 19 19:28:07 CEST 2004
"Swinton, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Swinton at astrazeneca.com> writes:
> # works as expected
> > ac <- c('A','B');
> > identical(ac,ac[1:2])
> [1] TRUE
>
> #but
> > af <- factor(ac)
> > identical(af,af[1:2])
> [1] FALSE
>
> Any opinions?
Hmm, surprising indeed. The proximate cause would seem to be that
> names(attributes(af))
[1] "levels" "class"
> names(attributes(af[1:2]))
[1] "class" "levels"
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-help
mailing list