is.na(v)<-b (was: Re: [R] Beginner's query - segmentation fault)

[Paul Lemmens]

Hello Simon,

--On woensdag 15 oktober 2003 10:08 +0100 Simon Fear 
<Simon.Fear at synequanon.com> wrote:

> By the way, `is.na(x) <- FALSE` will leave x unchanged (including
> leaving it as NA ! how bad is that ?!)
>
Twilight Zone (Golden Earring). But with that remark I'm getting off topic, 
so thank you for your summary. I've already memorized the is.na() 
construct, so I should be safe for the time being :>

kind regards,
Paul



-- 
Paul Lemmens
NICI, University of Nijmegen              ASCII Ribbon Campaign /"\
Montessorilaan 3 (B.01.03)                    Against HTML Mail \ /
NL-6525 HR Nijmegen                                              X
The Netherlands                                                 / \
Phonenumber    +31-24-3612648
Fax            +31-24-3616066