[R] Specifying suitable PC to run R
Roger D. Peng
rpeng at jhsph.edu
Thu Oct 9 20:22:37 CEST 2003
On Windows, I find that having as much memory as I can possibly afford
makes a real difference with R. Since I always end up having larger
datasets/problems then I thought I'd have. My general strategy is to
maximize the amount of memory first -- if that doesn't work, then think
about getting a faster processor.
-roger
Michael Dewey wrote:
> If I am buying a PC where the most compute intensive task will be
> running R and I do not have unlimited resources what trade-offs should
> I make?
> Specifically should I go for
> 1 - more memory, or
> 2 - faster processor, or
> 3 - something else?
> If it makes a difference I shall be running Windows on it and I am
> thinking about getting a portable which I understand makes upgrading
> more difficult.
>
> Extra background: the tasks I notice going slowly at the moment are
> fitting models with lme which have complex random effects and
> bootstrapping. By the standards of r-help posters I have small
> datasets (few thousand cases, few hundred variables). In order to
> facilitate working with colleagues I need to stick with windows even
> if linux would be more efficient
>
>
> Michael Dewey
> med at aghmed.fsnet.co.uk
> http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk/home.html
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list