is.na(v)<-b (was: Re: [R] Beginner's query - segmentation fault)
Duncan Murdoch
dmurdoch at pair.com
Thu Oct 9 00:26:06 CEST 2003
<Tongue in cheek>
But surely
is.na(x) <- is.na(x)
is clearer than
x[is.na(x)] <- NA
(neither of which is a no-op).
</Tongue in cheek>
More information about the R-help
mailing list