[R] ISOdate() and strptime()
Prof Brian Ripley
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Fri Nov 14 12:03:00 CET 2003
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, RINNER Heinrich wrote:
> Dear R-people!
>
> I am using R 1.8.0, under Windows XP.
> While using ISOdate() and strptime(), I noticed the following behaviour when
> "wrong" arguments (e.g., months>12) are given to these functions:
>
> > ISOdate(year=2003,month=2,day=20) #ok
> [1] "2003-02-20 13:00:00 Westeuropäische Normalzeit"
> > ISOdate(year=2003,month=2,day=30) #wrong day, but returns a value
> [1] "2003-03-02 13:00:00 Westeuropäische Normalzeit"
> > ISOdate(year=2003,month=2,day=35) #wrong day, and returns NA
> [1] NA
> > ISOdate(year=2003,month=2,day=40) #wrong day, but returns a value
> [1] "2003-02-04 01:12:00 Westeuropäische Normalzeit"
> > ISOdate(year=2003,month=22,day=20) #wrong month, but returns a value
> [1] "2003-02-02 21:12:00 Westeuropäische Normalzeit"
>
> And almost the same with strptime():
> > strptime("2003-02-20", format="%Y-%m-%d")
> [1] "2003-02-20"
> > strptime("2003-02-30", format="%Y-%m-%d")
> [1] "2003-03-02"
> > strptime("2003-02-35", format="%Y-%m-%d")
> [1] NA
> > strptime("2003-02-40", format="%Y-%m-%d")
> [1] "2003-02-04"
> > strptime("2003-22-20", format="%Y-%m-%d")
> [1] NA
>
> Is this considered to be a user error ("If you put garbage in, expect to get
> garbage out"), or would it be safer to generally return Nas, as in
> ISOdate(year=2003,month=2,day=35)?
Expect to get the best guess at what you intended, and expect this to
depend on your OS.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
More information about the R-help
mailing list