[R] problem with srt vector in xyplot {lattice}
Patrick Connolly
p.connolly at hortresearch.co.nz
Tue Jan 28 21:42:24 CET 2003
On Fri, 24-Jan-2003 at 01:23PM -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
|> On Friday 24 January 2003 10:54 am, Wolfram Fischer - Z/I/M wrote:
|> > [ R 1.6.1 ]
|> >
|> > PROBLEM
|> > The plot of the appended code does produce
|> > a postscript file which is not interpretable
|> > by gv under Linux.
|>
|> The srt vector has several NA's. x11() does not draw these, which may or may
|> not be what you want. You should be able to reproduce that in postscript()
|> with an additional subset = !is.na(Solar.R) argument to xyplot().
Is there a simple reason why x11 doesn't require the !is.na() whereas
postscript does? It took me an hour or more to work out what was
happening when I had a similar problem.
best
--
Patrick Connolly
HortResearch
Mt Albert
Auckland
New Zealand
Ph: +64-9 815 4200 x 7188
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~
I have the world`s largest collection of seashells. I keep it on all
the beaches of the world ... Perhaps you`ve seen it. ---Steven Wright
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~
More information about the R-help
mailing list