[R] Is R really an open source S+ ?
    Rex_Bryan@urscorp.com 
    RexBryan1 at attbi.com
       
    Wed Jan 15 00:51:02 CET 2003
    
    
  
 This is not a criticism.  I'm just curious.  Is there an effort to keep R
comparable to S+?
Or are the two languages diverging?  I am doing what probably legions have
done before me,
and legions will after me...using R on examples from text books written with
S+ code.  Most of the
time everything appears to be equivalent.  And then there are amazing
divergences in commands.  For
instance:
S:  stdev
R:  sd
why this difference?
Other examples...
S:  Bootstrap
R:  Boot
S:  Jackknife
R:  NA
S: T, F
R: TRUE, FALSE
For those who want to use open source R but still use the excellent S+
literature...these differences can be confusing.  I can also appreciate the
stress on authors attempting to express code that works in both languages.
REX
    
    
More information about the R-help
mailing list