[R] multiple numerical variables in aov

[Rishabh Gupta]

Prof,
 It is true that you sent me the email earlier but the way that my email is sorted, Chuck's emails
were at the top of my list and hence I read it and responded to it first.
With respect to providing me with *all* the info, Chuck did this also although he did so in two
differnt emails. He seems to have CCed only one of them two the r-help mailing list though.
Finally, my follow up question was about something that was mentioned in Chuck's email but was not
in yours.

THANK YOU

Rishabh

 --- Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Rishabh Gupta wrote:
> 
> >  Thanks very much for your help. Just a follow up question..
> 
> Although you had been told precisely that earlier, for some reason I don't 
> get any thanks.
> 
> > Like I said I was using aov() instead of anova(). I want to maintain maximum compatability
> with
> > what I've been using so far and I notice that manova() is just a wrapper to 
> > aov(). 
> 
> Notice a bit harder.  The `wrapper' changes the class, and summary.manova
> does all the work.
> 
> > How important
> > is it to use summary(......, test="Wilks") exactly, do you think that the default test
> statistic
> > would be sufficient.
> 
> Sufficient for what?  The default test is the default for a good reason.
> 
> > Once again, many thanks for your help.
> 
> Once again, it is not polite to ignore others who give you the same help, 
> especially when it comes from the person who provided you with *all* of 
> this.
> 
> -- 
> Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
> Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
> University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
> 1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
> Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595
>