[R] warning in binomial analysis
Thomas Lumley
tlumley at u.washington.edu
Mon Sep 23 02:59:50 CEST 2002
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Maindonald wrote:
> Surely any problem is with the fitted probabilities, not
> with the coefficients.
Yes, but I think it's a symptom of a problem with the covariates.
If we were working in single precision there could well be other
explanations, but 1- exp(eta)/(1+exp(eta)) is only 3e-7 (and thus has
seven or eight accurate digits) for eta=15. Even for eta=25 we are
nowhere near complete numerical breakdown.
You could construct a situation where this warning would occur
even with finite MLEs, but I'd be surprised to see it happen in a case
where I would be happy with the fitted coefficients (the deviances are
another matter). On the other hand, it happens quite often with sparse
design matrices when the MLEs are really infinite.
-thomas
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
More information about the R-help
mailing list