[R] add1 in glm

[Murray Jorgensen]

ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Murray Jorgensen wrote:
> 
> 
>>I'm having a bit of difficulty using the stepwise model-building tools
>>in a glm context. Here, for example is one problem I have had using
>>add1, where the abbreviation "." does not work as I expected it to do. I
> 
> 
> What did you expect?  `.' means `what is already there' in updating a
> formula, so you asked for nothing to be added.  The help page says
> 
>    scope: a formula giving the terms to be considered for adding or
>           dropping.
> 
> and that seems precise to me.

Well I based it on my interpretation of the beginning of the first 
example in the V&R discussion, also the first example in the stepAIC() page:

data(quine)
quine.hi <- aov(log(Days + 2.5) ~ .^4, quine)

This seemed to suggest that "." meant "all the predictors". Now that I 
know what "." means, my error is clear.

Does anyone know of  functions for adding the best single term (or 
dropping the worst) from a specified scope? (Respecting marginality, of 
course!)

Murray









-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._