[R] glm with binomial errors in R and GLIM
Prof Brian D Ripley
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Fri Mar 1 18:17:16 CET 2002
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Ronaldo Reis Jr. wrote:
> In my continuous transition of GLIM to R I try to make a glm with binomial
> errors.
>
> The data file have 3 vectors:
> h -> the factor that is ajusted (have 3 levels)
> d -> number of animais alive (the response)
> n -> total number of animals
>
> To test proportion of alive, make d/n.
>
> In GLIM:
>
> $yvar d$
>
> $error binomial n$
>
> $fit +h$
>
> scale deviance = 25.730 (change = -9.138) at cycle 4
> d.f. = 15 (change = -2)
>
> factor h is significant by chisq² with 2df fron tables = 5.99
>
> $disp e$
>
> estimate se parameter
> 1 -0.1054 0.2055 1
> 2 0.7985 0.2961 h(2)
> 3 0.08827 0.26764 h(3)
> Scale parameter taken as 1.000
>
> In R:
>
> > modelo.glex24.1 <- glm((d/n)~h,family=binomial)
> Warning message:
> non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in: eval(expr, envir, enclos)
Please don't ignore warnings.
> > summary(modelo.glex24.1)
>
> Call:
> glm(formula = (d/n) ~ h, family = binomial)
>
> Deviance Residuals:
> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
> -0.66227 -0.09918 -0.06041 0.18103 0.64740
>
> Coefficients:
> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
> (Intercept) -0.06119 0.81688 -0.075 0.940
> h2h 0.57994 1.17433 0.494 0.621
> h3h 0.07761 1.15499 0.067 0.946
>
> (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
>
> Null deviance: 2.0737 on 17 degrees of freedom
> Residual deviance: 1.7843 on 15 degrees of freedom
> AIC: 31.147
>
> Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 2
>
> > anova.glm(modelo.glex24.1,test="Chisq")
> Analysis of Deviance Table
>
> Model: binomial, link: logit
>
> Response: (d/n)
>
> Terms added sequentially (first to last)
>
>
> Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev P(>|Chi|)
> NULL 17 2.07368
> h 2 0.28935 15 1.78433 0.86530
> >
>
> The values calculate by GLIM and R is very different, in GLIM h is
> significant and in R no.
>
> What is my error????
You forgot the weights, the analogue of `binomial n'. You want either
glm(cbind(d, n-d) ~ h, family = binomial)
or
glm(d/n ~ h, weights = n, family = binomial)
This is discussed in lots of places in the R literature, too many for me to
point you to them all, but Venables & Ripley springs to mind ....
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
More information about the R-help
mailing list