[R] lme: anova vs. intervals
Martin Henry H. Stevens
HStevens at muohio.edu
Fri Jun 21 15:22:22 CEST 2002
Windows 2000 (v.5.00.2195), R 1.5.1
I have an lme object, fm0, which I examine with anova() and intervals().
The anova output indicates one of the interaction terms is significant, but
the intervals output shows that the single parameter for that term includes
0.0 in its 95% CI. I believe that the anova is a conditional (sequential)
test; is intervals marginal or approximate? Which should I trust as more
accurate or, alternaitvely, more conservative?
Partial output follows.
Thanks for the insight.
Hank
> anova(fm0)
numDF denDF F-value p-value
(Intercept) 1 69 6331.902 <.0001
Fert 3 44 42.176 <.0001
Seed 1 44 0.488 0.4886
Litter 1 69 1.830 0.1805
Density 1 69 68.714 <.0001
Fert:Seed 3 44 0.061 0.9799
Fert:Litter 3 69 0.294 0.8294
Fert:Density 3 69 0.381 0.7667
Seed:Litter 1 69 0.005 0.9447
Seed:Density 1 69 0.449 0.5048
Litter:Density 1 69 0.141 0.7087
Fert:Seed:Litter 3 69 0.256 0.8565
Fert:Seed:Density 3 69 4.254 0.0081
Fert:Litter:Density 3 69 1.814 0.1527
Seed:Litter:Density 1 69 4.083 0.0472
Fert:Seed:Litter:Density 3 69 1.047 0.3773
> intervals(fm0)$fixed
lower est. upper
(Intercept) 2.8880007 3.25040348 3.61280623
...
Density 0.1076366 0.41670852 0.72578044
...
SeedC:LitterR:Density -0.4803310 0.06412348 0.60857794
Martin Henry H. Stevens, Assistant Professor
338 Pearson Hall
Botany Department
Miami University
Oxford, OH 45056
Office: (513) 529-4206
Lab: (513) 529-4262
FAX: (513) 529-4243
http://www.muohio.edu/~botcwis/bot/henry.html
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
More information about the R-help
mailing list